• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Banner, L. (2009). Biography as History. The American Historical Review, 114(2), 579–586.
  • Brown, S. (2012). Two minutes of silence: Social technologies of public commemoration. Theory & Psychology, 22(2), 234 –252.
  • Brubaker, J., Hayes, G., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society: An International Journal, 29(3), 152–163.
  • Burkitt, I. (2002). Technologies of the self: Habitus and capacities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 219–237.
  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
  • Department of Communication Information Technology and the Arts. (2003). Management of Scientific Research and Development Projects in Commonwealth Agencies: Better Practice Guide for Senior Management. Canberra: Australian National Audit Office.
  • England, P. (2010). The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475
  • European Commission. (2018). Ethics in Social Science and Humanities. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020_ethics-soc-science-humanities_en.pdf
  • European Network Remembrance and Solidarity. (2015). Guidelines for international discourse on history and memory. Retrieved from https://enrs.eu/guidelines
  • Floridi, L. (2012). Technologies of the Self. Philosophy & Technology, 25, 271–273.
  • Foucault, M. (1986). The History of Sexuality, Volume 3, The Care of the Self. Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self. A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality, Volume 2, The Use of Pleasure. Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1993). About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198–227.
  • Foucault, M. (1998). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1, The Will to Knowledge (Pantheon B).
  • Funkenstein, A. (1989). Collective Memory and Historical Consciousness. History and Memory, 1(1), 5–26.
  • Gillis, J. (1994). Commemorations. The Politics of National Identity. Princeton University Press.
  • Graham, C., Arnold, M., Kohn, T., & Gibbs, M. (2015). Gravesites and websites: a comparison of memorialisation. Visual Studies, 30(1), 37–53.
  • Hess, A. (2007). In digital remembrance: vernacular memory and the rhetorical construction of web memorials. Media, Culture & Society, 29(5), 812–830.
  • Ihde, D. (1995). Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Northwestern University Press.
  • Kamerman, J. (2003). The postself in social context. In C. Bryant (Ed.), Handbook of death & dying (pp. 302–309). Sage Publications.
  • Kiran, A. H. (2012). Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. Human Studies, 35(1), 77–93.
  • Klein, C. (2016). Biography as a concept of thought: On the premises of biographical research and narrative. In H. Renders, B. de Haan, & J. Harmsma (Eds.), The Biographical Turn: Lives in History (pp. 79–86). London: Routledge.
  • Maddrell, A. (2013). Living with the deceased: absence, presence and absence-presence. Cultural Geographies, 20(4), 501–522.
  • Matei, S. (2015). Digital cultures of commemoration. Learning and unlearning history through video games. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (pp. 777–782).
  • Matei, S. (2018). Responsibility Beyond the Grave: Technological Mediation of Collective Moral Agency in Online Commemorative Environments. Design Issues, 34(1), 84–94.
  • Matei, S. (2019). Noua viață de apoi. Imortalitatea socială în contextul tehnologiilor digitale. București: Editura Tritonic.
  • Matei, S., & Preda, M. (2016). Status After Death. Understanding Posthumous Social Influence Through a Case Study on the Christian-Orthodox Tradition. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 15(45), 257–282.
  • Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
  • Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering. Open University Press.
  • Misztal, B. (2010). Collective Memory in a Global Age: Learning How and What to Remember. Current Sociology, 58(1), 24–44.
  • Olick, J., & Robbis, J. (1998). Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140.
  • Reading, A. (2011). Memory and Digital Media: Six Dynamics of the Globital Memory Field. In M. Neiger, O. Meyers, & E. Zandberg (Eds.), On Media Memory. Collective Memory in a New Media Age Collective Memory in a New Media Age (pp. 241–252). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Renders, H., & de Haan, B. (2014). Theoretical Discussions of Biography. Approaches from History, Microhistory, and Life Writing. Leiden: Brill.
  • Roberts, P. (2004a). Here Today and Cyberspace Tomorrow: Memorials and Bereavement Support on the Web. Generations, 28(2), 41–46.
  • Roberts, P. (2004b). The Living and the Dead: Community in the Virtual Cemetery. Omega. Journal of Death and Dying, 49(1), 57–76.
  • Roberts, P. (2012). ‘2 people like this’: Mourning according to format. Bereavement Care, 31(2), 55–61.
  • Société Suisse d’Histoire. (2004). Code d’éthique et Principes de la liberté de la recherche et de l’enseignement scienti-fiques de l’histoire. Retrieved from http://www.sgg-ssh.ch/sites/default/files/files/ethikkodex_grundsaetze_layout_f_erg_0.pdf
  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Acting artifacts. The technological mediation of action. In A. Slob & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), User Behaviour and Technology Development. Shaping Sustainable Relations Between Consumers and Technologies (pp. 53–60). Springer.
  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis. Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26.
  • Walker, G. L. (2018). The Invention of Female Biography. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Walter, T. (2015). New mourners, old mourners: online memorial culture as a chapter in the history of mourning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 21(1).
  • Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
  • Yancey Martin, P. (2004). Gender as Social Institution. Social Forces, 82(4), 1249–1273.
  • Zerubavel, E. (1996). Social memories. Steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology, 19(3), 283–299.
  • Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time Maps. Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Zerubavel, E. (2012). Ancestors and Relatives. Genealogy, Identity, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.